Skip to main content

Change Talk: Encouraging client arguments for change.

One of the things that makes Motivational Interviewing unique and different from other methods of counseling is the emphasis in MI on "change talk." Change talk is defined as client speech that favors movement in the direction of healthy behavior change. When we hear change talk, the client is arguing for change. In MI, we want to encourage change talk so we learn how to recognize and reinforce client change talk. We also learn specific techniques to elicit this kind of language because the more a client argues for change, the more likely he or she will actually make a healthy change in behavior.

There are several types of change talk identifiable in client speech. There are statements of desire, ability, need, reasons and commitment. The first four of these types are preliminary or preparatory types of change talk. A person might say that he wants to change, can change, or give you good reasons to change or tell you why he needs to change. All these statements should be recognized and reinforced. The likelihood of change increases, though, when clients give us commitment talk, when they say they “will” take some action toward change. Statement of commitment are the golden nuggets that MI counselors are seeking because commitment language actually predicts change.

Two simple ways to elicit change talk, if you are not hearing your client spontaneously giving it to you, are the use of scaling questions and the use of a decisional balance worksheet. (For more information on scaling questions, listen to my podcast on my web page: www.motivationalinterviewingonline.com)

The decisional balance worksheet is simply a sophisticated pros and cons list. In the decisional balance worksheet, though, instead of just asking about the pros and cons of a behavior change one is asked about the good things and not so good things about both changing behavior and maintaining the status quo. Asking about the good things for maintaining the status quo can be a very powerful technique in itself for eliciting what is rewarding about a particular, unhealthy behavior. When you hear answers to questions about the good things about changing and the not so good things about the status quo, though, you are eliciting change talk from your client.

There are at least 8 additional techniques taught in MI for eliciting change talk from our clients. These can all be learned readily and are usually taught in an introductory workshop. The real learning, however, takes place when you use the techniques with your clients and hear them arguing for change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I guess it's traditional to say a few words about New Year's resolutions at the beginning of the year, so here goes. The statistics say that only about half of us make New Year's resolutions and only about 1 out of 5 people that make them, keep them. You couldn't tell by going to my gym, though, since the place is uncomfortably crowded these days. But, as usual, about a month from now people's motivation will wane and I'll be able to get on my favorite elliptical trainer again. Resolutions are made to be broken, but goals, on the other hand, can keep us focused all year. So, how do you keep yourself motivated to accomplish the goals that you set for yourself this year? Well, if you know MI, why not use the techniques that you use to motivate your clients to motivate yourself? MI is about eliciting "change talk" from your clients. The more change talk, the more likely people will change. What is your favorite technique for eliciting change talk from yo

Motivational Interviewing Goes to War

We know that motivational interviewing is used effectively for addictions, psychological problems, health related behavior change, medication adherence, life coaching, and other “clinical” issues. But what about it’s use in the military setting? A recent article by James Cowan, Nengyalai Amalyar and Mohammad Mustafa argues for the use of MI in the area of combat advising. If United States forces are ever to leave Afghanistan, “standing up a professional Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) is central” to this effort, according to the authors. Doing so requires a partnership between advisors and Afghan military personnel. Advisors assigned to Afghanistan are told anecdotally that establishing an effective partnership depends on such elements as; developing rapport and respect, building trust, sharpening skills of persuasion, exercising patience, effecting empowerment, etc. but they are not given direct training in effective, proven ways to do these things. The authors argue that MI is